Help Evaluate GMO Peer-reviewed LiteratureJanuary 11, 2017
Is there a scientific consensus about genetically modified organisms and health? The Alliance for Science is examining that question, and we invite you to participate as a rater in their research study! You don't need a degree in science to participate—just the willingness to contribute your time and unbiased perspective. They are evaluating more than 12,000 abstracts (1996-2015) available from Web of Science, one of the largest aggregators of published information in the sciences and using a method derived from researchers studying global warming and climate change.
How can you help? You can help by rating the abstracts. Scientists and citizen scientists may read the abstracts and decide if the abstract makes a determination on whether biotechnology has an implicit, explicit, or neutral statement on human health. These terms and the numerical score will be explained in the rating itself. You choose the number of randomly assigned abstracts you want to rate (either 100 or 200), and you will have five days after you sign up to complete ratings. Each abstract will be rated twice, by two independent raters (and no rater will receive the same set of abstracts to rate), and once again by the author of the abstract (pending their participation). Raters must meet the following criteria:
- Be at least 18 years of age
- Have experience reading scientific and highly technical abstracts, written in English, on plant genetics
- Be able to rate abstracts impartially, even if you have strong opinions about genetically modified organisms
We know that you will want to participate! The nature of this academic study requires a fair bit of work. There will be no compensation but they are offering the following incentives:
- You will be included in the "acknowledgements" section of any subsequent peer-reviewed publications. (Your ratings, however, will remain completely anonymous. All ratings will be randomized before analysis, and are secured by Cornell University's IT infrastructure.)
- You will be participating in an innovative approach to scientific research review!
Read more about the study on the Alliance for Science website. Ready to get started? Email Jaron Porciello (Associate Director, Research Data Engagement) email@example.com to get started and for more information. This study is approved by Cornell University's Institutional review board, Protocol ID#: 1604006296.
The Crop Biotech Update is a weekly newsletter of ISAAA, a non-for-profit organization. The CBU is distributed for free to over 23,000 subscribers worldwide to inform them about the key developments in biosciences, especially in agricultural biotechnology. Your support will help us in our mission to feed the world with knowledge. You can help by donating as little as $10.
See more articles:
News from Around the World
- Governments to Integrate Biodiversity Conservation Across Agri Sectors
- Study Presents Evidence on Movement of Potato Famine Pathogen
- Researchers Crack Genetic Basis of Cotton Leaf Shape
- Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, NRGene Assemble Second Maize Reference Genome
- Cuba to Plant GM Soybean and Corn in Spring 2017
- ICAR NBPGR Unearths Genetic Potential of Wheat Germplasm
- MicroRNA 157 Regulates Floral Organs Development and Ovule Production in Cotton
- Triple Gene Construct Confers Insect Resistance and Herbicide Tolerance in Tobacco
Plant Breeding Innovations
- Genome Editing of Citrus Susceptibility Gene CsLOB1 Confers Resistance to Citrus Canker
- CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Mutations in SELF PRUNING 5G Promotes Day-neutrality and Early Yield in Tomato
From the BICs
- Agricultural Biotechnology and its Potential Application in Vietnam
- Help Evaluate GMO Peer-reviewed Literature
- IPBO & IIBN Release Book on "Innovative Farming and Forestry Across the Emerging World: The Role of Genetically Modified Crops and Trees"
- ISAAA Blog: Trending News on Crop Biotech in 2016
Subscribe to CBU: