Negative GMO Perceptions Could Influence Gene-Edited Crop Acceptance

A study in Southern Ontario, Canada, finds that public perceptions of gene-edited crops may be strongly influenced by the negative frames that have shaped perceptions of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Researchers from the University of Toronto and McMaster University examined public understanding of GMOs and CRISPR crops in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area, and how past GMO debates shape attitudes toward gene editing.

The research team conducted a public survey of adults alongside interviews with science journalists. The results showed continued hesitation toward both GMOs and CRISPR crops, with acceptance shaped largely by consumer concerns, such as cost and purchasing behavior. Journalists interviewed in the study highlighted key challenges, including limited public understanding of biotechnology, the influence of social media, and the cost of goods.

The study found that many people do not distinguish between traditional GMOs and CRISPR-edited crops. The researchers warn that without clearer communication and transparency, CRISPR crops may become associated with the negative perceptions long tied with GMOs. They say stronger science communication will be critical to improving public understanding and acceptance of emerging crop technologies.

For more information, read the study from GM Crops & Food.