Government Regulations Affect Public Perception on Gene-edited Crops -StudyNovember 2, 2022
A study involving participants from the United States, Germany, and Japan sought to understand how different biotechnology regulations impact public perceptions in the three countries in order to gain insight into how the underlying political culture affects their attitudes.
A total of 2,667 respondents from the US, 2,383 from Germany, and 2,193 from Japan participated in the survey to statistically examine how different information provision affect their perceptions on the risks and benefits towards gene-edited food crops, considering that the three countries have different levels of regulations. Results showed that the participants from the US perceived the highest benefits and lowest risks of the groups validating the assumption that public attitudes on gene editing are more positive in a country that has less strict gene-editing regulations. Between Germany and Japan, the Japanese participants perceived greater benefits while the German participants perceived the least benefit and greatest risk that may be attributed to their reduced exposure on the beneficial aspects of gene-editing information.
Further studies were recommended to better understand the key factors that affect perceptions of risk and benefits of new scientific innovations and establish a new model of science communication.
You might also like:
- Regulatory Frameworks Among Factors that Affect Genome Editing Adoption, According to Experts
- Study Defines Important Aspects in Communicating about Genome Editing in Europe
- Introducing Genome-edited Foods to the Public – Lessons from Japan
The Crop Biotech Update is a weekly newsletter of ISAAA, a not-for-profit organization. The CBU is distributed for free to over 23,000 subscribers worldwide to inform them about the key developments in biosciences, especially in agricultural biotechnology. Your support will help us in our mission to feed the world with knowledge. You can help by donating as little as $10.
See more articles:
News from Around the World
- Scientists Sequence Honeycrisp Apple Genome
- Australia's OGTR Invites Comments on Commercial Import and Distribution of GM Chrysanthemum
- Prospects of Purple Tomato in Australia
- ISAAA Webinar: Research and Development of Biotech Crops in the Philippines
- India's GEAC Recommends the Environmental Release of GM Mustard DMH-11
- Research Team Presents Circadian Clock Insights that Could be Key to Increased Wheat Yield
- UK’s Precision Breeding Bill Enters House of Lords
- Breakthrough in Panama Disease Control in Bananas
- Drought-tolerant Sugarcane Performs Well in Chinese Field Trials
- Rice Genes Reveal Alternative Sources of Rice Blast Resistance
Plant Breeding Innovations
- CRISPR Technology Market to Drive More Business Opportunities
- Government Regulations Affect Public Perception on Gene-edited Crops -Study
Read the latest:
- Crop Biotech Update (January 25, 2023)
- Genome Editing Supplement (January 18, 2023)
- Gene Drive Supplement (January 25, 2023)
Subscribe to CBU: