"Scientific Consensus" Counters False Beliefs on GM Foods, StudyOctober 6, 2021
A group of experts from Radboud University in The Netherlands documented that informing people of a scientific consensus opposing their false beliefs, especially about genetically modified (GM) foods, can help to correct those beliefs. The strategy can be beneficial in campaigns to counter misinformation about the benefits of GM foods.
The researchers were determined to investigate if helping people understand and identify scientific consensus at first could help change their beliefs and lead them to better scientific understanding. They used an online crowdsourcing platform to select 1,500 participants from the United States who believed that GM food is worse for a person's health than non-GM food. The participants were then presented with an infographic about the value of scientific consensus and how to identify it. Afterward, they were asked to read a new article about a scientific consensus that contradicted their beliefs.
Through data analyses, the researchers found strong evidence that the two-step communication strategy was successful in correcting misinterpretations. Their research demonstrated that empowering people to understand and identify scientific consensus can help to better correct a false belief. They concluded that communicating scientific consensus, paired with science communication campaigns focused on boosting understanding and identification of scientific consensus, is an effective beginning for strategies to counteract scientific misinformation.
Learn more from Psychological Science.
You might also like:
- Study Finds Providing Facts about GMO, Climate Change to Skeptics Helps Change Their Mind
- Misinformation and Over-regulation Keeping GM Foods from Consumers
- US Ag Secretary Perdue: "Don't Fear Your Food"
The Crop Biotech Update is a weekly newsletter of ISAAA, a not-for-profit organization. The CBU is distributed for free to over 23,000 subscribers worldwide to inform them about the key developments in biosciences, especially in agricultural biotechnology. Your support will help us in our mission to feed the world with knowledge. You can help by donating as little as $10.
See more articles:
- Vaccines Cut Delta Transmission But Not for Long
News from Around the World
- Nobel Prize in Physics 2021 Goes to Three Laureates for Climate Work
- "Scientific Consensus" Counters False Beliefs on GM Foods, Study
- USDA Deregulates Corn for Phytase Production Developed Using Genetic Engineering
- Calyxt to Develop Better Soybean Oil as Palm Oil Alternative
- Australian OGTR Receives License Application for GM Wheat and Barley Field Trial
- UK Government Gets Support of Scientists After Decision To Ease Gene Editing Rules
- Genetic Engineering and Beetroot Dye Tomatoes Purple
- Researchers Discuss Transporters and Transcription Factors Involved in Rice NUE
- Improving Plant Growth and Biomass by GA20ox Overexpression
- GE Canola That Produces DHA Passes Food and Feed Safety Study
Plant Breeding Innovations
- Study Reveals Role of OsFtsH2 in Chloroplast Development in Rice
Read the latest:
- Crop Biotech Update (June 29, 2022)
- Genome Editing Supplement (June 22, 2022)
- Gene Drive Supplement (June 29, 2022)
Subscribe to CBU: