Bias-language Study About GM Crops Reveals Positive Stance About Genetic ModificationJuly 21, 2021
A group of scientists from the United States and Sweden analyzed peer-reviewed journal articles about genetically modified (GM) crops to determine if they contain language bias affected by social and linguistic factors. Several interesting conclusions were derived, including articles discussing Bt genetic modification corresponded to a positive stance.
The researchers initially selected more than 1,800 journal articles published from 2000 to 2018. These were classified into positive, negative, and neutral. After several classifications and analyses using several tools such as ANOVA, Biber POS Tagger, Random Forest Model, and others, the articles were narrowed down to 230 in PDF format and the following results were drawn:
- Forty percent (40%) of the articles had a positive or negative stance towards GM crops;
- Articles with a negative stance were more common in the early 2000s;
- The top three regions with the highest positive stance are China, the United States, and the European Union;
- Articles that had a positive stance were more likely to be funded by private organizations;
- Articles discussing the Bt genetic modification corresponded to positive stances; and
- Based on public opinion polls and indirect opinions identified in the study, political and social factors may play a role in the ratio of positive to negative stance articles from different regions.
To conclude, the researchers found that peer-reviewed articles on GM crops contain language bias, and suggest that the possibility of an automated tool to screen manuscripts for unintended biased language before publication may be used in the future.
Read the full article in Environmental Research Letters.
You might also like:
- Language, Key in Communicating about Genome Editing
- Journalists and Policymakers Demand for Simple Biotech Messages
- Experts Highlight Importance of Scicom and Farmer Adoption in Building Knowledge on Biotech
The Crop Biotech Update is a weekly newsletter of ISAAA, a non-for-profit organization. The CBU is distributed for free to over 23,000 subscribers worldwide to inform them about the key developments in biosciences, especially in agricultural biotechnology. Your support will help us in our mission to feed the world with knowledge. You can help by donating as little as $10.
See more articles:
- Initial Trials of Nasal Spray Vaccine for COVID-19 and Flu Show Positive Results
- CRISPR Gene Editing Stops COVID-19 from Replicating in Infected Human Cells
News from Around the World
- Bias-language Study About GM Crops Reveals Positive Stance About Genetic Modification
- Regulatory and Governance Considerations for Gene Drive Research
- Nitrogen Use Efficient Rice Getting Closer to Farmers' Fields in Nigeria
- Wild Sorghum Offers Toolbox for Climate-Proof Crops
- USDA APHIS Proposes Exemption of Gene Modifications Similar to Conventional Breeding from Biotech Regulations
- Australian Researchers Develop Tools to Identify Plant Genes Resistant to Disease-causing Fungi
- Wageningen Scientists Unravel Onion Genome
Plant Breeding Innovations
- Chinese Scientists Predict Bright Future for Genome Edited Oil Crops
- Nitrogen Use Efficient Wheat Developed Using CRISPR-Cas9
- Remodeling the Gene Editing Regulatory Landscape Necessary, Report
Subscribe to CBU: