No Difference in Meat and Milk Nutritional Values of Genome-edited and Conventional CattleJuly 6, 2022
A two-year study conducted by researchers from the University of California Davis found that the meat and milk from genome-edited (GnEd) cattle had nutritional values within the same range as that of conventional cattle, further suggesting that biotechnology tools can be safely applied to animals to achieve useful ends.
The study involved six GnEd calves and 10 controls, in which the GnEd calves were offspring of a GnEd bull homozygous for the dominant Pc POLLED allele. Health, growth, and nutritional composition of animal products from the 16 cattle were gathered and it was found that the six GnEd offspring did not differ in growth, health, and development compared to the controls.
As for the meat and milk nutritional composition, nutrient values for sirloin cap, chuck arm, and tri-tip collected by the GnEd offspring and controls were found to be within range in beef databases. Milk composition, on the other hand, was found to vary within controls over time. But it was later found that almost all values were within peer-reviewed literature ranges. It is important to note that none of the variations pose hazards to human health.
The researchers concluded that the six polled offspring of the GnEd bull were healthy, and products derived from them were nutritionally similar to conventional cattle and are within the norms of known biological variability.
You might also like:
- No Difference Found in Meat, Milk From Gene Edited Cows vs Conventional Cows
- Plant-based Milk Bottles Launched in New Zealand
- Pocket K No. 11: Contribution of GM Technology to the Livestock Sector
Biotech Updates is a weekly newsletter of ISAAA, a not-for-profit organization. It is distributed for free to over 22,000 subscribers worldwide to inform them about the key developments in biosciences, especially in biotechnology. Your support will help us in our mission to feed the world with knowledge. You can help by donating as little as $10.
See more articles:
Research and Tools
- OsPP65 Negatively Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Rice
- Designer TALE Successfully Produces Plant Growth Regulator to Increase Rice Yield
- No Difference in Meat and Milk Nutritional Values of Genome-edited and Conventional Cattle
- ‘Softer' Form of CRISPR Edits Genes More Accurately
- Danish Research Project Refines CRISPR; A Step Towards More Precise and Effective Use of Genetic Scissors
- First CRISPR Drug Coming Soon
Read the latest:
- Biotech Updates (September 27, 2023)
- Gene Editing Supplement (September 27, 2023)
- Gene Drive Supplement (February 22, 2023)
Subscribe to BU: