News and Trends

http://www.unep.fr/scp/rpanel/pdf/Assessing_Biofuels_Full_Report.pdf
http://www.unep.fr/scp/rpanel/biofuels.htm

The subject of biofuels has become an important policy keyword in the minds of many government decision makers, because of its energy and environment implications. However, it has also become a "burning issue" in the light of contrasting viewpoints in favor or against the adoption of a national biofuel policy, as expressed in many publications. Consequently, "it has become increasingly difficult for decision-makers to identify the key messages on which to build their decisions". To assist governments and industry sectors in making "sustainable choices in an area that over the past few years has become deeply divided while triggering sharply polarized views", the International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management (IPSRM) of the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) recently released its first assessment report, "Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels". According to UNEP Executive Director and Panel host,  Achim Steiner, "Biofuels are neither a panacea nor a pariah, but like all other technologies, they represent both opportunities and challenges". The focus of this first report is on the "first generation biofuels, due to availability of state-of-the art reviews, but also considers further lines of development". Among the highlights of the report are: (1) not all biofuels perform equally well in terms of their impact on climate, energy security, and on ecosystems; environmental and social impacts need to be assessed throughout the entire life-cycle, (2) land conversion for biofuel crops can lead to negative environmental impacts including implications such as reduced biodiversity and increased GHG emissions, (3) water is another limiting factor, both in terms of quality and quantity. The full report can be accessed at the UNEP website (URL above)..


http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/pdf/1754-6834-2-27.pdf

A paper by Jeffrey Wolt from Iowa State University (United States) stresses the need for advancing risk assessment for transgenic biofuel crops as a "critical element to the rapid and cost effective development of plant biofuel resources". The use of modern biotechnology (in this instance, the use of "transgenics") is seen as an enabling technology that is "implicit in the successful movement towards a biofuel future". Transgenic biofuel feedstock cases include strategies to (1) improve the feedstock's "processability" for biofuel conversion (for example, imparting in planta bioprocessing enzymes, such as built-in amylases or cellulases within the plant, to reduce saccharification costs), and (2) to increase the feedstock tolerance to environmental stresses when grown in marginal land areas. The "use of a particular transgenic concept" often undergoes a broad range of commercial, regulatory, or public scrutiny, and considerations are often approached within a narrow, regulatory context, and a broader decision context. The paper discusses the advancement of transgenic plant risk assessment (with reference to bioenergy crops) by "appropriate interfacing science with the needs for decision-making". The full paper is published in the open access journal, Biotechnology for Biofuels (URL above)..

Biofuels Processing

http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/pdf/1754-6834-2-28.pdf

The shake flask (SF) system has been a common reaction system for laboratory scale assessment of enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. The enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass involves the use of enzymes (such as cellulases or hemicellulases) to convert the carbohydrate polymers (mainly cellulose and hemicellulose) into simple sugars for bioethanol fermentation. In the SF system, solid lignocellulosic biomass is usually size-reduced to particle size, and suspended in water with added enzyme treatment. When the solids loading of the particle-sized biomass is very high, the SF system may no longer be effective because the shaking (mixing) intensity may not be sufficient to keep the high-solids suspension in a homogeneously agitated state. Effective, homogeneous mixing allows better contact of the solids with the enzymes and result in higher reaction rates. Scientists from the National Bioenergy Center of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (United States) developed a roller bottle reactor (RBR) system which can provide better mixing compared to SF systems. Experiments using the RBR system under a broad range of experimental conditions showed that it can work well for a variety of pretreatments and enzyme systems. A relatively low amount of mixing input can mitigate mass transfer limitations which can often occur at high solids loading. The full paper can be accessed in the open-access journal, Biotechnology for Biofuels..


http://www.alphagalileo.org/PrintView.aspx?ItemId=62301&CultureCode=en
http://www.thebioenergysite.com/articles/469/bioproducts-from-pruning-waste-from-olive-trees

Scientists from Jaen University (Spain) have reported the use of a mathematical model from which the optimum conditions for the hydrolysis of waste from olive prunings can be made for subsequent conversion into biofuel ethanol or a value bioproduct, xylitol. The goal was to obtain the optimum time and temperature to reach maximum production. According to the researcher, Professor Alberto Moya Lopez, once the waste has been collected to particle size, the optimum hydrolysis conditions can be applied. The hydrolyzing agent attacks the hemicellulosic and cellulosic fractions of the olive pruning waste. Hemicellulose hydrolysis will produce pentosan (mainly xylose), which could be used to produce xylitol (a major "dental friendly", component in chewing gum), while the attack in the cellulosic fraction could produce glucose, which can be used to develop ethanol..

Biofuels Policy and Economics

http://www.usda.gov/oce/reports/energy/ELCAofSoybeanBiodiesel91409.pdf
http://www.thebioenergysite.com/articles/467/energy-lifecycle-assessment-of-soybean-biodiesel

A new energy lifecycle study for soybean biodiesel has updated the first comprehensive 1998 life cycle study for soybean biodiesel produced n the United States. The study is contained in a report by scientists from the University of Idaho and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). A life cycle study of a particular biofuel product is essentially an accounting of material and energy flows, as it goes through the process of feedstock plantation/transportation, biofuel processing, and final use as fuel. It allows an assessment, whether the biofuel product has a positive or negative net energy yield or whether it has positive or negative emissions of an environmentally-polluting material (such as greenhouse gases). The "fossil energy ratio" is one index for assessing energy yield. The 1998 study pegged the fossil energy ratio of soybean biodiesel at 3.2. That is, 3.2 units of energy are produced for every unit of fossil fuel used for its production. In contrast, petroleum diesel has a fossil energy ratio of only 0.84. The recent life cycle study shows a higher (i.e. much better) fossil energy ratio for soybean biodiesel at 4.56. The much improved value (based on 2002 soybean production data) is attributed to the following factors: (1) better (more energy efficient) soybean crushing facilities, (2) improved (agricultural) soybean yields, (3) less fertilizer/pesticide use. The full report can be accessed at the USDA website (URL above)..


http://beag.ag.utk.edu/
http://bipartisanpolicy.org/sites/default/files/U.%20Tenn.%20RES%20Briefing%20Presentation%2010-23-2009.pdf

A report by the University of Tennesee's Bio-Based Energy Analysis Group (BEAG) predicts that "significant market opportunities for agriculture" can be realized under the national Renewable Energy Standard (RES) policy. The RES policy in the United States requires American utility companies to provide a minimum percentage of the energy they produce from renewable sources. Under a 25% RES policy by 2025, the increased demand for biomass feedstock is substantial, and increases in gross receipts ranging from US$9,000 per farm to US$16,000 per farm is projected in Florida, Colorado, North Carolina and Kansas. More job creation is seen in scenarios with stronger RES targets, and in Federal (rather than state) proposals. According to co-author, Dr. Burton English, the jobs are diverse; these are driven not only by the build up of new energy infrastructure, but also are associated with growing the biomass and collecting and bundling forest residues that will fuel power plants. The report was presented October 23 during a briefing at the United States Senate..