
New Breeding Technologies: A Good Investment Or Not?
July 20, 2007 |
Many technologies are available to breeders to help them improve the efficiency of their selection programs. Among the newer technologies are marker assisted selection, genomics, and physiological selection. But does the investment on these technologies pay off in the end? Researchers John Brennan and Peter Martin at the Australian Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute say it does.
Brennan and Martin presented comparative economic analyses between conventional breeding and that which uses new technologies in their paper published in Euphytica. They presented cases where the use of new technologies can help increase the returns on investment in breeding programs by reducing associated costs during varietal development, such as labor cost or direct inputs.
The researchers cited the potential benefits that breeding programs can gain from molecular markers as well as from adopting an indirect selection system using physiological indices. An economic assessment of phenotypic evaluation versus the use of molecular markers showed that the latter can offer lower costs especially under high-throughput systems. Their estimates on the cost of line evaluation range from $8 to $16 when using molecular markers and $2 to $163 when phenotypic evaluation is employed.
For more information, the paper can be accessed by subscribers at http://www.springerlink.com/content/x618j83872px7217/.
|
Biotech Updates is a weekly newsletter of ISAAA, a not-for-profit organization. It is distributed for free to over 22,000 subscribers worldwide to inform them about the key developments in biosciences, especially in biotechnology. Your support will help us in our mission to feed the world with knowledge. You can help by donating as little as $10.
-
See more articles:
-
News from Around the World
- Congressional Gold Medal Awardee Dr. Norman Borlaug On Biotech
- Agricola Medal Awarded to Turkish Prime Minister
- Kenya to Host Africa’s Newest Agriculture Body
- Kenyan Mps Back Call to Enact Biosafety Law
- IFAD-Supported Horticulture Program To Boost Incomes And Jobs to Rural Kenya
- Status of Agri-Biotech In South Africa
- USDA Releases Draft Environmental Impact Statement
- DuPont To Open New Soybean Research Center In Kansas
- Dow Agrosciences, Sangamo Biosciences Announce New Milestone In Crops Development
- GM Potatoes Banned From Potato Homeland
- India Studies Show Benefits of Bt Cotton
- Indo Economist Bats For Biotech
- Animal Health Code Needed, Say Philippine Scientists
- Approval of A Biosafety Framework In Vietnam
- US, Vietnamese Scientists Aim New Stage In Cooperation
- In Pursuit of Salt-Tolerant Wheat
- Bayer Cropscience’ Nunhems Acquires Korean Seed Company
- Greece Extends Ban on Gm Maize
-
Research Highlights
- Producing Marker-Free Site-Specific Transgenic Plants
- New Breeding Technologies: A Good Investment Or Not?
- Pepper Gene Confers Nematode Resistance in Tomato
- Increasing Crop Carotenoids By Metabolic Sink Manipulation
-
Announcements
- 15th International Tradefair for Biotechnology (BIOTECHNICA) Hannover, Germany, 9-11 October, 2007
- EuroBio 2007, Lille, France from 26 to 28 September 2007
-
Resources
- Publication on Marker-Assissted Selection in Agriculture
- Double Helix Proceedings Available On-line
-
Read the latest: - Biotech Updates (April 30, 2025)
- Gene Editing Supplement (April 30, 2025)
- Gene Drive Supplement (February 22, 2023)
-
Subscribe to BU: - Share
- Tweet