NH Lawmakers Explain Why They Voted Against Biotech Labeling BillJanuary 22, 2014
Members of the New Hampshire (NH) Environment and Agriculture Committee namely Rep. Tara Sad and Rep. Bob Haefner explained why they voted against House Bill 660, which requires labeling of biotech foods. According to them, no credible scientific study has shown that there is any material difference between biotech and non-biotech food, particularly in nutritional value and health safety. Thus, when foods containing biotech products would be labelled, it will mislead consumers by falsely implying differences where none actually exist.
Legal experts have also said that the bill is unconstitutional because requiring food companies to label their products with no health or safety reason fails the state interest test, undermines commercial free speech and violates interstate commerce. Furthermore, Sad and Haefner stressed that product labeling is a federal responsibility, and not a state responsibility. The Food and Drug Administration identifies which information needs to be available on food labels, not to satisfy consumer curiosity, but for health and safety reasons. The FDA and other trusted scientific organizations have all come out in support of biotech foods, stating that foods made with this process are as healthy and nutritious as their conventional counterparts.
Read the original article at http://www.unionleader.com/article/20140121/OPINION02/140129929.
The Crop Biotech Update is a weekly newsletter of ISAAA, a not-for-profit organization. The CBU is distributed for free to over 23,000 subscribers worldwide to inform them about the key developments in biosciences, especially in agricultural biotechnology. Your support will help us in our mission to feed the world with knowledge. You can help by donating as little as $10.
See more articles:
News from Around the World
- International Team Works to Confer Virus Resistance to the Most Important Brassica Vegetable
- African Orphan Crops Consortium Announces 100 Crops for Sequencing
- Disease Resistant Bean Varieties Increase African Farmers' Income
- Texas A&M Team Develops Longer, Stronger Cotton Fiber
- Genome Sequencing Reveals What Puts the 'Heat' in Hot Peppers
- ISU Researchers Sequence Genome of Fusarium
- NH Lawmakers Explain Why They Voted Against Biotech Labeling Bill
- Scientists Develop Climate Resilient Wheat for South Asia
- China Renews Biotech Corn Import Certificates
- India's President Calls for Urgent Need to Dispel Fears Over GM Crops
- India to Adopt Science-led Pathway for Agricultural Development
- Temperature Changes Affect Wheat Resistance to Yellow Rust
- EFSA Releases 2013 Annual Report of its Scientific Network for Risk Assessment of GMOs
- Protein from Pathogenic Bacterium Confers Insect Resistance in Tobacco
- Scientists Evaluate Effect of Phytase Transgenic Corn on Laying Hens
Beyond Crop Biotech
- Scientists Pinpoint Genes for Deafness in Dogs
- Soil Microbes Alter DNA in Response to Warming
- Plant Breeding for Drought Tolerance
- 4th Annual International Conference on Advances in Biotechnology
- ISAAA Releases Video on Biotech Crops Adoption in China, India, and the Philippines
Read the latest:
- Crop Biotech Update (September 28, 2022)
- Genome Editing Supplement (September 21, 2022)
- Gene Drive Supplement (September 28, 2022)
Subscribe to CBU: