News and Trends

http://www.iea.org/textbase/papers/2008/2nd_Biofuel_Gen.pdf

A report from the IEA (International Energy Agency) analyzes the impacts and limitations of first generation biofuel feedstocks, and the growing interest in the shift toward the use of second generation energy crops.  First-generation feedstocks are generally those which are derived from food sources (such as corn for ethanol and soybean for biodiesel).  These have been found to have “limited capabilities for oil product substitution, and climate change”.  Furthermore, these feedstocks have sustainability issues.  The cultivation of first generation feedstocks may cause “undue competition for land and water used for food/fiber production”.  Interest in the use of second generation (non-food based) feedstocks (such as agricultural residues, vegetative grasses and short-rotation forest trees) have arisen because these are seen to avoid the “concerns facing first generation feedstocks”.  Furthermore, second generation energy crops are said to have a long term cost reduction potential.  The report also analyzes the technical challenges that must be hurdled in industrial biofuel production from second generation feedstocks, and the current policies to support their development.  The full report can be obtained at the IEA website (URL above).


http://www.aocs.org/news/story.cfm?id=824
http://www.ceres.net/
http://www.bladeenergy.com/

An American company, Ceres, has announced the launching of its first seed sales for “dedicated energy crops” for switchgrass and high-biomass sweet sorghum. “Dedicated energy crops” can be considered as “non-food, low-carbon crops developed specifically as raw materials for biofuels”. The seeds are marketed under the “Blade Crops” label. Switchgrass and sweet sorghum are considered cost-effective and “sustainable” feedstocks for ethanol production. Among its positive features are: low agricultural inputs, capability for cultivation in marginal lands, and good energy/carbon balances. According to Anna Rath, vice president for commercial development, “Switchgrass and high-biomass sorghum can provide new options for growers, especially on under-performing acres”. There are two seed products for switchgrass and high-biomass sweet sorghum seed products available. More information can be obtained at the Ceres of Blade Crops website (URL above).


http://www.biodieselmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=3169
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ef800740d (may require paid subscription for full access)

The Biofuel Magazine website reports that scientists from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (United States) have developed a “method to accelerate stability testing of biodiesel fuel and identified additives that enhance stability at high temperatures”. The factors that affect the stability of a biodiesel product are oxidation and heating. Usually, the evaluation of oxidative and thermal stability is done separately. The new method allows the evaluation of both at the same time. According to NIST scientist, Thomas J. Bruno, the “advanced distillation curve method” could accelerate and simplify testing of biodiesels”. Additionally, the new method was also used to “demonstrate the effectiveness of three additives in reducing oxidation of biodiesel at high temperatures, as would occur in aviation fuels”. The research results involving the use of the new method are published in the journal, “Energy and Fuels” (URL above)..


http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7997&context=lbnl

Butanol (a 4-carbon alcohol) is considered an “advanced biofuel”, and is reported to have better biofuel features compared to its 2-carbon relative, ethanol. Although butanol has better energy density, better transportability in existing pipeline structures, and can be used in unmodified vehicles at higher blends (compared to ethanol), there are still some bottlenecks for industrial scale production. Butanol is mainly produced by bacteria of the genus Clostridium, under anaerobic conditions. Bacterial production of butanol by Clostridia is not considered a good method because of slow bacterial growth, bacterial toxicity toward the butanol product at 1% to 2% concentrations, and production of significant quantities of unwanted by-products such as acetone. On the other hand, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the yeast commonly used for ethanol production, grows faster, has a higher alcohol tolerance and produces relatively less unwanted by-products. Scientists from the University of California Berkeley attempted to metabolically engineer Saccharomyces cerevisiae with an n-butanol biosynthetic pathway, in which isozymes from a number of different organisms were substituted with Clostridial enzymes. They evaluated the effect of the substitution on n-butanol production. Results showed that expression of the genes encoding the butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase from C. beijerinckii did not improve butanol production significantly. The problematic steps in the n-butanol biosynthetic pathway and those which could be taken for future improvement were identified..

Biofuels Processing

http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/21932/
http://www.lucatechnologies.com/content/index.cfm?fuseaction=showContent&contentID=6&navID=6

The Technology Review website reports that an American biotech-driven energy company, Luca Technologies, is investing US$ 76 million to scale up a process which utilizes coal-digesting microorganism to convert coal in underground beds to methane gas in industrial quantities. Methane is said to be a “greener fuel” because its burning releases only half the carbon dioxide emissions, relative to coal. The technology essentially harnesses the consortia of anaerobic microorganisms that naturally reside beneath the earth. By proper nutrient supplementation and “changing the chemistry of the microbes' living environment”, the microorganisms can be stimulated to produce large quantities of methane. In effect, the underground coal beds are converted in giant biogenic methane “geobioreactors”. The potential of the technology is said to be in the harnessing of buried hydrocarbon reserves “which cannot be extracted in an economical or environmentally benign fashion with current technologies and practices. These include deeply buried coal beds, organic-rich shales”..


http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf802487s (may require paid subscription for full access)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081210171900.htm
http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars/2008/11/25/used-coffee-grounds-for-biodiesel

Scientists from the University of Nevada (United States) have shown that biodiesel need not be produced from cultivated bioenergy crops, but also from waste raw materials, such as spend coffee grounds. Spent coffee grounds are solid waste materials from coffee brewing, and until recently, composting has been a common option for waste management. Scientists, Narasimharao Kondamudi, Susanta Mohapatra, and Mano Misra, found that the material still contains about 10% to 15% recoverable oil which can be used for biodiesel production. Aside from a projected stable supply of the waste for biodiesel conversion, the scientists also mentioned that the biodiesel product from spent coffee grounds would be “more stable than those from other sources because coffee contains antioxidants that would slow down degradation”. They were able to produce a biodiesel product with a 100% conversion efficiency of the extracted oil and with a stability lasting about one month under ambient conditions. About 340 million gallons of biodiesel can be reportedly produced from the waste coffee grounds around the world. The solid residue after oil extraction could also be used for “fertilizer, feedstock for ethanol, and as fuel pellets”. A publication of the research work appears in the Journal of Food and Agricultural Chemistry (URL above)..

Biofuels Policy and Economics

http://www.biodieselmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=3125

The “Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels” is a multi-stakeholder initiative by the Swiss EPFL (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) Energy Center, aimed at developing a management/policy decision tool for evaluating sustainability issues for biofuel feedstocks. A draft version of the biofuel sustainability principles and criteria (called “Version Zero”) was released last 2008 August, and is in the process of consultation/discussion. Stakeholder outreach meetings are scheduled to gather inputs on the draft, which will be finalized for publication late this year. According to the Biodiesel Magazine website, the outreach meetings are “aimed at biodiesel and ethanol producers, as well as other interested stakeholders from industry and the environmental movement”. RSB Coordinator, Matt Rudolf, mentions that there is a real feeling internationally, of a need for standards that [non-governmental organizations], environmental groups and the biofuels community will feel good about”. A voluntary system to certify sustainable biofuel production is being proposed by the RSB.

Related information on RSB
http://www.bioenergywiki.net/index.php/Roundtable_on_Sustainable_Biofuels
http://www.biodieselmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=2680&q=Roundtable&category_id=22
http://www.bioenergywiki.net/index.php/Version_Zero


http://www.bepress.com/jafio/vol6/iss2/art8/

Researchers from the University of California –Berkely (United States) recently published a paper which analyzes the impacts of biofuels policy on food and fuel markets. The paper titled, “The Economics of Biofuel Policy and Biotechnology” appears in the Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization. Among the interesting findings of their research are: (1) “biofuel policy can substitute for traditional agricultural policy intended to boost farm welfare”, (2) “food market volatility can induce periods of boom and bust in the ethanol industry, causing episodes of bankruptcy and reduced capital investment”, (3) innovations in cellulose ethanol technology and agricultural biotechnology can reduce ethanol market volatility. Details can be obtained at the Berkeley Electronic Press website (URL above)..