Table 34. Relative Agronomic and Economic Performance of Bt and Conventional Cotton in ICAR Field Trials in India in 2001 

Entries

Yield

 

Gross Income

Insecticide Control

Additional Cost of Bt

Net Income2

Difference2 between Bt and Checks

 
(q/ha)
(Rs/Ha)
(Rs/Ha)
Seed/Ha1
(Rs/Ha)
Rs/Ha
 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) = 2-(3+4)

(6)

MECH 184 Bt
14.00
25,200
1,413
2,425
21,362
9,141
Local Check
8.37
15,066
2,845
 
12,221
10,205
National Check
7.31
13,158
2,001
 
11,157
 
MECH 162 Bt
13.67
24,606
1,413
2,425
20,768
8,547
Local Check
8.37
15,066
1,845
 
12,221
9,611
National Check
7.31
13,158
2,001
 
11,157
 
MECH 12 Bt
11.67
21,006
1,727
2,425
16,854
4,633
Local Check
8.37
16,066
2,845
 
12,221
5,697
National Check
7.31
13,158
2,001
 
11,157
 
Source: ICAR, 2002.  Personal communication. Report on 2001 IPM Trial Cost Benefit Analysis (RS 48.5 = US$1.00)
  1  Original data adjusted by subtracting $50/hectare for premium for Bt cotton seed compared with conventional seed. In 2002 cost of 570 gms of conventional seed/acre was $10.39 compared with $30.39/acre for Bt seed; This translates to a premium of $20 per acre for Bt seed or $50 per hectare.
  2  Adjusted for premium of $50/hectare for Bt cotton seed.
   

To go back to the previous document, click here.

Home :: Global Status :: CBT Update :: Info Resource :: Events :: BICs :: Directory :: About Us :: Editorial Policy

Copyright © 2006. CropBiotech Net.