Crop Biotech Update


A weekly summary of world developments in agri-biotech for developing countries, produced by the Global Knowledge Center on Crop Biotechnology, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications SEAsiaCenter (ISAAA), and AgBiotechNet 
February 15, 2002

In This Issue:

New Approvals and Increase in Acreage of Biotech Traits: Proof of Public Acceptance
Time for Biotech in India
ANZFA: Baseless Fears About Labeling and GM Food Safety
Canada to Monitor Effects of GM Foods
NZ Approves Two More GM Crops for Trials
World Trade to Support Trade Opportunities for Developing World

 

NEW APPROVALS AND INCREASE IN ACREAGE OF BIOTECH TRAITS: PROOF OF PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE

The new approvals and plantings in the world in 2001, in addition to the pre-commercial biotech field trials underway, show that growers and government regulators recognize the benefits of this technology, says Robert T. Fraley, Monsanto's Chief Technology Officer. 

The number of acres planted with biotechnology traits developed by Monsanto increased approximately 14% to 118 million acres (48 million has) in 2001. In the US alone, acreage for Monsanto's biotech-enhanced traits rose by 17% in 2001 to more than 84 million acres (34 million has).

Aside from the increase in planting acreage, ten more new commercial approvals were given in over eight countries worldwide in 2001. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had also renewed several other registrations of GM crops. These include Roundup Ready soybeans, YieldGard Corn Borer corn, Bollgard cotton and Roundup Ready cotton. 

Research and testing of biotech products also continued throughout the world in 2001. Pre-commercial field trials of biotech products last year were conducted in about 25 countries on five continents. 

Future products in the pipeline for US growers include corn protected from the rootworm pest that will reduce chemical insecticide use and Bollgard II cotton that will expand Bollgard's insect control spectrum to include beet armyworm, fall armyworm and loopers. 

More detailed information is available at: http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/
media/02/02feb11_approvals.html
 




ANZFA: BASELESS FEARS ABOUT LABELING AND GM FOOD SAFETY

Australia New Zealand Food Authority's (ANZFA) Managing Director Ian Lindenmayer expressed disappointment at some lobby groups that have been spreading misinformation about the safety and labeling of genetically modified (GM) foods despite evidence to the contrary.

Mr. Lindenmayer said that ANZFA as the food regulator, "carries no bias for or against any particular food technology and that "we have now assessed about 20 GM commodities, using a very rigorous methodology." 

"I don't pretend that we have all the answers about GM foods, but we have enough to know that those we approve are at least as safe as their non-GM counterparts." ANZFA's Greg Roche was likewise cited as saying that "...we know more about the genetic make-up of these GM foods than any other food in the food supply".

ANZFA recently recommended the approval of genetically modified varieties of corn and canola. There are now 22 GM foods recommended for approval since July 2000. Of these, 10 have received final approval, four are pending ministerial approval and five are under public consultation.

Lindenmayer added that there are no loopholes in the labeling regulations. He said that the Ministerial Council made a conscious decision to apply the regulations to the final food, not to the process. Many ingredients which start out as genetically modified are subsequently processed to remove the genetically modified materials. For example, canola oil obtained from GM canola is identical to that obtained from non-GM canola. ANZFA ruled last December 2001 that food products have to be labeled as containing GM food only when the changes are evident in the final product for sale. 




NZ APPROVES TWO MORE GM CROPS FOR TRIALS

The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator of the Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Aging has approved the extension for two field trials of ACT New Zealand for GM barley and wheat. The field trails, which started last June 2001, will be extended till June 2003. It will be carried out at Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization's (CSIRO) Ginninderra Experimental Stations.

The current approval is for post harvest monitoring of the site for evidence of gene transfer to surrounding plants conducted by researchers from CSIRO Plant Industry, and funded jointly by CSIRO and the Grains Research and Development Corporation.

The barley plant was modified to resist the yellow dwarf virus and enhanced to improve germination rates and malting performance. Likewise, GM wheat was modified to improve the baking performance of flour derived from the wheat grains.




TIME FOR BIOTECH IN INDIA

The time has come for clarity on biotech, says R.S. Paroda, former Director General of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, and biotechnology "will have to be adopted". "India has the requisite strength and capacity to take advantage of the developments in biotechnology".

Paroda provides these insights in his book "Relevance of Genetically Modified Plants to Indian Agriculture" based on presentations in four workshops on genetically modified crops organized by the Tata Energy Research Institute.

The former DG says that people are "inquisitive about potential deleterious effects of transgenic varieties on biodiversity and environment, and that "these doubts cannot be dismissed and due attention will have to be paid to them". However, compared to Europeans, "we have to be a little more pragmatic, realistic and look for what is good", given the plight of poorer farmers in India.

Paroda also highlights the need to induce the private sector "to join the biotechnology race". "Since research in biotechnology is capital-intensive, biotechnology firms can be given extra concessions including tax benefits, longer repayment programme of loans and lower interest rates on credit."

Biotech can help solve problems relating to food and foreign exchange, says Paroda. However for this to happen, "we must talk on scientific principles and we must educate the NGOs and the farmers". "I think farmers are disillusioned and misguided because the messages that reach them are based not on scientific principles but on other reasons, and do more harm than good. It is our responsibility to see that this does not happen" he concludes.




CANADA TO MONITOR EFFECTS OF GM FOODS 

Health Canada's Centre for Surveillance Coordination will monitor Canadians to see if they get sick from eating genetically modified (GM) foods. However, research will be difficult because no one knows who's eating what and there are no labels on genetically modified food. 

"A basic prerequisite for any kind of analysis of the effects of GM foods on the population over time is that we know if people are consuming the items or not," said epidemiologist Bryan Embree of the Ontario Public Health Association. "And at this point, we simply don't have this information." 

It is estimated that 70 per cent of processed food contains some GM ingredients. None of the food is labeled and the genetically modified crops are usually mixed in with other crops. 

Environment Canada will also be monitoring the long-term environmental effects of genetically modified organisms.




WORLD TRADE TO SUPPORT TRADE OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEVELOPING WORLD

Director-General Jacques Diouf of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) addressed the African Agriculture Ministers at the recent 22nd FAO Regional Conference for Africa to support agricultural trade opportunities in the continent. He stressed that the living conditions of both the developed and the developing countries must be benefited by the globalization and liberalization of trade for agricultural products, movement of capital and technology transfers that takes place.

The notable improvement in some developing countries particularly in East Asia is counterbalanced by the decline in other regions like the sub-Saharan Africa, Central America and the Caribbean. Dr. Diouf pointed out that Africa is the only region in the developing world whose vast sector of the population is suffering from malnutrition and whose per capita food supply has declined for the last four years. One of the reasons he says is the limited possibilities of food production for local consumption and the lack of organized distribution networks and markets.

FAO has put up a Trust Fund for Food Security and Food Safety to help alleviate Africa agricultural dilemma. Currently, it has secured 20 percent of the funding goal and hopes that more funding would come in before the FAO World Food Summit in June 2002.

To obtain a full copy of the FAO's release visit:http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/OIS/
PRESS_NE/english/2002/2568-en.html
 

Do not hesitate to tell other colleagues/contacts about this mail list. If they wish to join, they should send an e-mail message to knowledge.center@isaaa.org leaving the subject blank and entering the one-line text message as follows: SUBSCRIBE Crop Biotech Network

To stop receiving this newsletter, please send an e-mail message to knowledge.center@isaaa.org and write, "unsubscribe newsletter" in the subject box.

Please visit CropBiotech Net web pages (http://www.isaaa.org/kc) to view previous issues of this newsletter and see other available resources for download.

While we are still developing this site, feel free to e-mail (knowledge.center@isaaa.org) us for your views and comments on any crop biotechnology product and related issues.
Home :: Global Status :: CBT Update :: Info Resource :: Events :: BICs :: Directory :: About Us :: Editorial Policy

Copyright © 2006. CropBiotech Net.