BIOFUELS SUPPLEMENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A bi-weekly summary of world developments on biofuels, produced by the Global Knowledge Center on Crop Biotechnology, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications SEAsiaCenter (ISAAA)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
February 13, 2009
In This Issue:
News and Trends
- Scientists Study Impacts of Alternative Energy on Water Consumption
- Updates on Small Scale Cellulose Ethanol Projects Under US-DOE Grant Program
- Test Flight on Aircraft Run by Camelina-Jatropha-Algae-based Biofuel a Success
- Cell Wall Structural Changes in Pretreated Wheat Straw for Cellulose Ethanol Production
Energy Crops and Feedstocks for Biofuels Production
- Complete Sequencing of Sorghum Gene Announced
Biofuels Processing
- Solvent-based Two-step Chemical Process Converts Lignocellulosics to Biofuel
Biofuels Policy and Economics
- Climate Change/Health Costs from Biofuel and Gasoline Air Emissions Assessed
- No-Till Agric Can Reduce GHG Emissions from Biofuel Feedstock Cultivations
* NEWS AND TRENDS *
Scientists Study Impacts of Alternative Energy on Water Consumption
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es800367m (full text html version)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081020094614.htm
Researchers from the University of Texas at Austin (United States) recently reported the use of a “Water Intensity” index, to compare/assess water consumption and withdrawal during the production and use of conventional and alternative fuels. They defined the water intensity index as “water usage per mile driven” (in the units, gallons water/mile). Their results showed that the lowest levels of water intensity (less than 0.15 gal/mile for water consumption and 1 gal/mile water withdrawal) were for light duty vehicles (LDV’s) using: (1) conventional petroleum-based gasoline/diesel, (2) non-irrigated biofuels, (3) hydrogen derived from methane or electrolysis via non-thermal renewable electricity, (4) electricity from non-thermal renewable energy resources. Biofuels from irrigated feedstocks in the United States were found to have relatively high values for LDV water intensities. For corn ethanol, water consumption and water withdrawal intensities were 28 gal/mile and 36 gal/mile, respectively. For soybean biodiesel, the water consumption and withdrawal intensities were 8 gal/mile and 10 gal/mile, respectively. Countries with limited water resources may need to carefully map out their own national biofuel policies considering the potential impacts of alternative fuels on water use. The full results are published in the September 2008 issue of the Environmental Science and Technology journal (URL above)..
Updates on Small Scale Cellulose Ethanol Projects Under US-DOE Grant Program
http://www.jgpress.com/archives/_free/001796.html
The Biocycle website reports some updates on nine cellulose ethanol projects under the United States Department of Energy (US-DOE)-Grants to accelerate the development of the cellulose ethanol industry. The grant funds ranged from US$ 25 million to US$ 30 million in funds (per grantee), covering 50 percent of design/construction of “one-tenth commercial scale biorefineries that serve as prototypes for full-scale commercial opportunities.” The projects have diverse lignocellulosic feedstocks (sugarcane bagasse, wood chips, wheat straw, etc) and pretreatment processes (mild acid treatment, steam explosion, wet oxidation, etc), all leading to ethanol as the final product. While some are in the construction phase of demonstration scale facilities, some have been affected by the recent economic downturn and had to be scaled-back or renegotiated. The report gives specific updates on the companies which were granted funds by the US-DOE: Verenium Corporation, Lignol Energy Corporation, Pacific Energy Inc., ICM Inc., Alltech, Mascoma Corporation, Flambeau River Biofuels Inc., Newpage and RSE..
Test Flight on Aircraft Run by Camelina-Jatropha-Algae-based Biofuel a Success
http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2009/01/30/japan-airlines-biofuels-flight-test-a-success-camelina-algae-jatropha-used-in-b50-biofuel-mix-fuel-economy-higher-than-jet-a/
http://press.jal.co.jp/en/uploads/01.%20Jan%2030%20Biofuel%20Press%20Release%20(English).pdf
Japan Airlines is reported to be the first Asian airline to have conducted a successful demonstration flight on an aircraft (Boeing 747-300) with one engine run by a “cocktail blend” of the following second generation biofuels: camelina (84%), jatropha (less than 16%) and algae (less than 1%). The one-and-a half hour test flight conducted in January this year had no modifications on the biofuel-powered jet engine, and the biofuel blend was used as a “drop-in replacement” for the conventional petroleum-based fuel. Camelina (also known as “false flax”), is considered a good biofuel feedstock because of its high oil content and its ability to grow in rotation with wheat and other cereal crops. These are in addition to camelina being non-food-based bioenergy crop. According to Boeing Japan President, Nicole Piasecki, the airline industry is “already working to secure its fuel future supply by establishing firm sustainable criteria to ensure that environmental impacts and carbon dioxide emissions from biofuels are significantly lower than fossil-fuel-based kerosene fuels”.
Related information on camelina:
http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=CAMEL
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelina
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/08/camelina-another-biofuel-feedstock-to-consider.php
A recent article from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) (February 10, 2009 issue) attempts to “quantify and monetize the life-cycle climate-change and health effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) emissions from gasoline, corn ethanol, and cellulosic ethanol. The paper by Jason Hill (University of Minnesota) and colleagues is titled, “Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline”. Results estimate that at $120 per Mg Carbon (1 Mg= 1 Mega gram), the cost estimates from increased GHG levels caused by production and combustion of an additional billion gallons of ethanol or an energy-equivalent amount of gasoline using some of the alternative methods are: $246 million for gasoline, $246 million for corn ethanol (natural gas heat), $56 million for switchgrass-based cellulosic ethanol and $21 million for prairie-biomass based cellulosic ethanol. The report mentions that cellulose ethanol fared better compared with corn ethanol because “cellulosic ethanol from corn stover or perennial crops requires lower inputs” (i.e., lower fertilizer and water requirements). Cellulosic ethanol also has “lower emissions at the biorefinery because lignin combustion provides process heat and power, thereby displacing fossil fuel inputs and electricity production”. The complete paper can be accessed at the URL above. On the other hand, the Renewable Fuels Association (URL below) responded to the report, saying that the analysis is based on “based almost entirely upon insufficient and extremely uncertain analysis of potential land use changes” (related information below).
Related information on response of the Renewable Association of America to the report http://www.ethanolrfa.org/objects/documents//u_of_m_-_ethanol_worse_than_gas_analysis.pdf
A study by scientists from the University of Michigan and Philips Academy Andover (United States) shows that “effective land management practices can reduce the so called carbon debt attributed to biofuels, to near zero.” According to the study, “no-till agriculture” can reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) attributed to biofuels. The complete results are published in a recent issue of the Environmental Science and Technology journal (volume 43 (2009)). The Biotechnology Industry Organization website summarizes the study as follows: (1) important variables that can improve greenhouse emissions from biomass cultivations have not been included in presently published land use studies, (2) “no-till agriculture can reduce the carbon debt associated with converting grassland and temperate zone forests to crop production to 4 and 20 years, respectively”, (3) “no-till with cover crop agriculture can create a carbon sink, resulting in higher soil organic carbon levels than those in unmanaged forests and grasslands”. The concept of “carbon debt for biofuel feedstocks” has been proposed by David Tillman as a “corollary to their carbon capture” (related information below). It is defined as “the amount of carbon dioxide released during the first 50 years of the process of clearing land for production of biofuel feedstocks.” Associated with “carbon debt” is the “carbon payback period” (the period that the “carbon debt” is paid when the cultivated feedstocks uptake carbon dioxide).
Related information:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;319/5867/1235?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Land+Clearing+and+Biofuel+Carbon+Debt
&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT
(may require paid subscription for complete access) http://biofuelsandclimate.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/biofuels-and-carbon-debt/