Crop Biotech Update

A weekly summary of world developments in agri-biotech for developing countries, produced by the Global Knowledge Center on Crop Biotechnology, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications SEAsiaCenter (ISAAA), and AgBiotechNet

December 22, 2003

In This Issue:

India to Invest in GM Crop Research
France Provides Incentive for Companies
FFA Supports GM Crops
Paraluman: Farmers Should Network with Scientists
ABE: Environmental Benefits from Crop Biotech
Appropriate Biotechnologies for Africa
UNU Releases Report on Biosecurity

GM Straw Could Increase Livestock Production

INDIA TO INVEST IN GM CROP RESEARCH

India’s Business Standard reports that India will invest Rs 40 crore or almost US $9 M to develop transgenic crop varieties. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) will initially pioneer research in 12 crops with focus on improving specific traits, such as resistance to insect pests, fungal diseases and viral diseases; tolerance to abiotic stresses like drought; and extension of product shelf life.

Initial crops include corn, pigeonpea, chickpea, soy bean, cotton, brassica, tomato, brinjal, banana, papaya, potato and cassava. Indian scientists are already working on transgenic varieties of cotton, rice, potato, mustard, pigeonpea, chickpea, brinjal, tomato, cabbage, cauliflower, tobacco, pulses, castor and groundnut.

Agriculture Minister Rajnath Singh told the parliamentary consultative committee attached to his ministry that biotechnology laboratories under ICAR and state agricultural universities will be upgraded for the project. He also added that a committee under agricultural scientist M.S. Swaminathan was examining agricultural biotechnology issues. Its report due next month is expected to guide future policy concerning genetically modified organisms and harmonization of activities of ministries concerned with the issue.

The full article is available online at http://www.business-standard.com/today/story.asp?Menu=22&story=30130


FFA SUPPORTS GM CROPS

Solleti Jayapal Reddy, Secretary-cum-Treasurer, Federation of Farmers Associations (FFA) in Andra Pradesh, stated during the recent “Farmer to Farmer: Sharing Experiences Related to Agricultural Biotechnology” workshop in Manila, Philippines, that the FFA strongly supports new technologies that have the potential to alleviate the economic well being of Indian farmers, and protect the environment. Solleti said that 67% of India’s population is still based on farming and other rural activities.

The FFA also opts for a re-focusing of research and development (R&D) programs by all organizations (public and private) in India. Re-focusing is suggested based on the following points:

  • R&D must keep the small farmer as its prime focal point.
  • R&D must be localized to ensure higher productivity, better quality and greater adaptability to local environmental factors.
  • R&D must provide resistance to environmental factors such as salinity, drought, and water logging.

Further, Solleti presented the need for an international organization, similar to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which could be empowered to carry out multi-locational and long-term studies to address biosafety issues worldwide. A universal license to trade genetically modified (GM) products should also be established by this future organization.

The Federation of Farmers Associations, AP (FFA) is a state level apex organization of various farmers federations in India. On the other hand, the farmer workshop was co-organized by the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, University of the Philippines Los Banos, SEAMEO Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture, Cornell University, and the United States Government under the auspices of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. The Asian Farmers Regional Network or ASFARNET, which aims to promote the active exchange of experiences and knowledge on alternative modern farming technologies, was likewise formed during the workshop.

For more information on ASFARNET, email Dr. Randy Hautea, ISAAA Southeast Asia Center director at r.hautea@isaaa.org.


ABE: ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS FROM CROP BIOTECH

Crop biotechnology offers real environmental advantages to growers compared to conventional cropping systems. The use of currently available GM crops by European farmers could help them to grow crops more efficiently while providing sustainable options that can improve farmland wildlife diversity. This is a conclusion of an issue paper published by Agricultural Biotechnology in Europe (ABE), an association of private sector agricultural companies, as it sought to study scientific evidence gathered over several years about the environmental aspect of crop biotechnology.
Other conclusions are:

  • Appropriate use of biotech seeds gives farmers additional opportunities to favor biodiversity without yield loss from weed competition and pest damage.
  • Secondary benefits such as reduced fuel usage arising from management of genetically modified crops can also make a significant contribution to lessening farming’s environmental impact.
  • Crops now in development may in the future give additional benefits such as built in resistance to certain diseases.

The full issue paper entitled “Environmental Benefits of Crop Biotechnology for European Agriculture” is available in pdf format from Siemen de Jong of Bayer Crop Science at siemen.dejong@bayercropscience.com. More on ABE at http://abeurope.dynamicweb.dk.


UNU RELEASES REPORT ON BIOSECURITY

Practical measures to assist Central Asian countries and Mongolia are necessary to develop their capacity to access genetic resources, share in the benefits of technologies, and ensure biosafety. This is the gist of the United Nations University’s Institute of Advanced Studies’ report entitled “In Search of Biosecurity: Capacity Development on Access to Genetic Resources, Benefit-Sharing, and Biosafety in Central Asia and Mongolia.”

These practical measures include:

  • Development of the Central Asian and Mongolian Biosafety and Bioresources Network;
  • Increase in stakeholder participation in international negotiations;
  • Increase in knowledge base for greater and more readily accessible information on policy making, and examples of best practices and protection on traditional knowledge; and
  • Increase in international awareness about the situation in Central Asia and Mongolia.

The report was prepared based on country reports by Central Asian countries and Mongolia as well as proceedings of the said workshop held in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. It is available online at http://www.ias.unu.edu/binaries/UNUIAS_CentralAsiaReport.pdf


FRANCE PROVIDES INCENTIVE FOR COMPANIES


The French government recently adopted Jeunes Enterprises Innovantes (JEI), a special incentive status for young innovative companies. Starting 2004, innovative companies will be exempt from tax and social contributions for eight years. Adeline Farrelly of EuropaBio, the European associations of bioindustries, says this incentive will make France a leading player in attracting innovative companies.

France Biotech - the national biotech association - was the first to propose the initiative to the French government last year. Farrelly added that biotechnology, one of the most research-intensive industries in Europe,will greatly benefit from the JEI.  
 
In the United Kingdom, the first major review of the biotech sector, a joint government-industry initiative, has generated a comprehensive White Paper, BioScience 2015. It aims to keep the UK biotech industry in a strategic position in Europe. It also included a recommendation on tax incentives for young innovative enterprises.
 
Additional information may be obtained from Adeline Farrelly at a.farrelly@europabio.org. A copy of “What is the Young Innovative Company Status?” is available at http://www.europabio.org/pages/ne_papers.asp?btype=7.

 
PARALUMAN: FARMERS SHOULD NETWORK WITH SCIENTISTS

“We need to improve our networking with our scientists, schools and researchers to bring their knowledge and discoveries to every farmer worldwide. Let us abandon the image of farmers as (being) poor, ignorant and helpless. Instead we should be proud … for eventually we are the ones who are feeding the world,” says Edwin Y. Paraluman, Member, ASFARNET, and President, Nursery Farmers Irrigation Association, General Santos City, Philippines.

Speaking before fellow farmers in the recent “Farmer to Farmer: Sharing Experiences Related to Agricultural Biotechnology” workshop in Manila, Philippines, Paraluman discussed his experiences as a corn farmer, and how he was able to do advocacy and networking with scientists and universities. He also emphasized the importance of modern communication facilities in the efficient transfer of technology, and for increasing market linkages.

The farmer workshop was co-organized by the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, University of the Philippines Los Baños, SEAMEO Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture, Cornell University, and the United States Government under the auspices of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. The Asian Farmers Regional Network or ASFARNET, which aims to promote the active exchange of experiences and knowledge on alternative modern farming technologies, was formed during the workshop.

For more information on ASFARNET, email Dr. Randy Hautea, ISAAA Southeast Asia Center director at r.hautea@isaaa.org.


APPROPRIATE BIOTECHNOLOGIES FOR AFRICA

“Making biotechnology work for African agriculture would mean harnessing the technology to address the socio-economic and agronomic constraints faced by African smallholders, rather than relying on technologies developed for other contexts. However, there is still a growing concern that the futuristic possibilities of genetic engineering are diverting attention – and resources from other promising technologies,” says Dominic Glover of the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex in Brighton, United Kingdom.

He also suggests that laboratory researchers and end-users be linked together for the successful adoption of technologies. Linkages between these two stakeholders have been previously applied to developing-country biotechnology programs in the past. In Africa’s case, biotechnologies that would be appropriate are those that are:

  • Affordable and would allow farmers to save and exchange seeds;
  • Manageable and appropriate for small plots of land in marginal areas;
  • Responsive to local livelihood contexts, including patterns of labor availability;
  • Suitable for use with a varied cropping system, including a number of different crops;
  • Focusing on traits like drought tolerance, nutrient-use efficiency and disease resistance, rather than traits like herbicide tolerance which require expensive inputs;
  • Suitable and acceptably safe for introduction into the local ecosystem; and
  • Backed up by appropriate support, such as access to credit, markers and extension services.

Glover added that some advocates of agricultural biotechnology say that Africa should embrace the biotechnology revolution, particularly genetically modified (GM) crops to improve their people’s plight.

Dominic Glover’s paper entitled “Biotechnology for Africa?” can be downloaded at http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/env/PDFs/Briefing10.pdf.


GM STRAW COULD INCREASE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION

Jonathan Gressel, Professor of Plant Sciences of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, and colleagues observed that straw could increase animal production, by at least one third, if its lignin content is decreased through genetic modification. This process would make straw more digestible, and also increase the carbohydrate available to ruminant animals.

Gressel stated that if straw can be converted into hay-quality material using a combination of biotechnology, physical and chemical treatments, this roughage could be given more ecological and economic importance. Ammonification, which separates lignin and serve as a nitrogen source for ruminant bacteria, and biotreatment with ligninolytic fungi are the technologies that can be used for upgrading.

This technology, according to the researchers, could increase cattle, goat, and sheep production by at least 25%. US and Europe could produce another 200 million cattle per year (35% increase); Asia 250 million more cattle (50% increase); Africa 170 million more goats per year, or 500 million goats if its current grain yields were tripled to match the global average; and Australia could produce 30 million more sheep (25% increase).

For more information, email Jonathan Gressel at Jonathan.Gressel@weizmann.ac.il

Do not hesitate to tell other colleagues/contacts about this mail list. If they wish to join, they should send an e-mail message to knowledge.center@isaaa.org leaving the subject blank and entering the one-line text message as follows: SUBSCRIBE Crop Biotech Network

To stop receiving this newsletter, please send an e-mail message to knowledge.center@isaaa.org and write, "unsubscribe newsletter" in the subject box.

Please visit CropBiotech Net web pages (http://www.isaaa.org/kc) to view previous issues of this newsletter and see other available resources for download.

While we are still developing this site, feel free to e-mail (knowledge.center@isaaa.org) us for your views and comments on any crop biotechnology product and related issues.
Home :: Global Status :: CBT Update :: Info Resource :: Events :: BICs :: Directory :: About Us :: Editorial Policy

Copyright © 2006. CropBiotech Net.