In This
Issue:
GENOMICS-BASED
BIOSAFETY
Putting
emphasis on genomics-guided transgenes (GGT) based on native or
homologous genes could allow regulators to make it much simpler
to conduct certain types of genetically modified (GM) field trials.
This means focusing on the source of introduced genes and their
similarity to those already in the recipient plants. Steven Strauss,
professor of forest science at Oregon State University, forwarded
this view noting that in Europe, field trial regulations are preventing
the exploration of GGT. This prevents potential environmental benefits
from being introduced into agriculture.
Strauss
says that GGT trials should have the same rules as conventional
breeding trials at the exploratory field trial stage. "All
agriculture has risks and large environmental impacts. The question
is whether the risks seem within the range of those we accept daily."
The
professor argues that current regulations make biotechnology difficult
for small companies. It calls for a more realistic and cheaper
approach to field trials which could lead to "democratization",
hence, allowing more small companies to conduct them.
Strauss'
paper entitled "Genomics, Genetic Engineering and Domestication
of Crops" appears in Science (300, 61-62). Email Steven Strauss
at steve.strauss@orst.edu for
more information.
EU REQUESTS 12 STATES
TO ADOPT GMO LEGISLATION
The
European Commission (EU) has formally requested 12 Member States
to adopt and notify legislation to implement the EU law on the
deliberate release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into
the environment. These Member States are France, Luxembourg, Belgium,
Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Ireland, Greece, Spain, Portugal,
Austria and Finland.
The
twelve Member States failed to meet the October 17, 2002 deadline
for the adoption and notification of such legislation. Some of
the components in the EU directive include:
- Principles
governing environmental risk assessment
- Mandatory
post-market monitoring, including monitoring of possible long-term
effects on the environment
- A
requirement to communicate information to the public
- A
requirement for Member States to ensure labeling and traceability
at all stages of marketing
- A
requirement that initial approvals of GMOs be limited to a maximum
of ten years
- An
obligation to consult the European Parliament on decisions to
authorize the release of GMOs
This
press statement from the EU is available online at http://europa.eu.int
NEW ZEALAND'S "GM-FREE" LABELING SYSTEM
In lieu
of the Royal Commission's recommendation, the New Zealand government
organized an interdepartmental working group, composed of the Ministry
of Consumer Affairs and the New Zealand Food Safety Authority,
to facilitate the development of a voluntary "GM-Free" Labeling
System.
The
government's purpose in facilitating the development of a GM-free
labeling system is to assist businesses to meet consumer demands
for information by labeling their food as GM-free. This labeling
system also aims to ensure the accuracy of information provided
to the consumers.
The
scheme was discussed in a discussion paper entitled "Voluntary
GM-Free Labeling" to raise some of the issues surrounding
GM-free labeling, and to look at what is involved in the development,
ownership and administration of such a labeling system. The paper
discusses that a successful labeling system should meet various
consumer and industry expectations or "drivers." Some
of the required measures are as follows:
To meet
Consumers' Expectations:
- The
labeling system should have low "transaction costs" (the
cost to the consumer in obtaining information).
- Meaningful
and easy to understand information should be provided to the
consumers at the lowest possible costs.
- Consumers
can place confidence in the source of information.
To meet
Industry's Expectations:
- Industry
benefits (competitive advantage, increased profit, market penetration)
must outweigh the risks (not meeting consumer demand, lacking
credibility, being inconsistent with legislation) and costs (market
research, development, marketing and verification).
Other
issues that need to be addressed during the development of the
system also cover the following areas: ownership and administration,
technical expertise, consumer confidence, flexibility, on-going
support, dispute resolution, and funding. The full paper can be
downloaded at http://www.mfe.govt.nz/issues/organisms/food.html.
SCIENTISTS DISCOVER GENE REGULATOR OF RICE TILLERS
Xueyong
Li and colleagues at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing,
China, successfully isolated and characterized the gene Monoculm
1 (MOC1), which genetically controls rice branching and bud formation.
Rice
mutants transformed with up to 3 copies of MOC1 gene produced 2-3
fold more tillers than wild-type plants. High-tillering transformed
plants were also shorter than wild-type plants, indicating that
MOC1 also affects plant height, another economically important
trait. Since tillering in rice is an important agronomic trait
for grain production, genetic manipulation of MOC1 gene can be
a strategy to increase rice productivity.
Li and
his colleagues screened rice plant collections for mutants with
altered tiller numbers. Genetic analysis with reciprocal crosses
between tiller mutants and wild-type plants revealed that the tiller
mutants possess a recessive mutation in a single locus. The MOC1
gene was then mapped to the long arm of chromosome 6, and encoded
a nuclear-localized protein of 441 amino-acid residues. Although
MOC1 was confirmed to be a key regulator of rice tillering, they
believe that this is still a complex process which involves expression
of many genes.
Xueyong
Li and colleagues' research is featured in Nature and can be downloaded
at http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v422/n6932/abs/nature01518_fs.html
HASTERT: WTO ACTION
FOR GMF MARKETS
Official
action by the World Trade Organization (WTO) is necessary to open
markets for genetically modified foods (GMF). This was stressed
by US House Speaker Dennis Hastert during a testimony at the House
Agriculture Committee. Specifically, he said that the use of non-tariff
barriers was becoming an imminent threat to free trade in GMF.
"Free
trade will be rendered meaningless if it is short-circuited by
non-tariff barriers that are based on fear and conjecture- not
science," Hastert said. He cited two cases, one of which is
the current European moratorium on GM products which has resulted
in an annual loss of over $300 million in corn exports for US farmers.
Another case is the rejection of US food aid because the shipments
contained biotech corn. The impact of these policies, Hastert noted,
would affect farmers' competitiveness and the ability to provide
food for the world's population.
The
full report is in the website of the American Society of Plant
Biologists. Visit http://www.aspb.org/publicaffairs/agricultural/hastert.cfm
KWAZULU-NATAL FARMERS
MAKE GOOD FROM GM CORN
Initial
data from KwaZulu-Natal farmers in South Africa show that those
who planted genetically modified (GM) white corn for the first
time this season significantly boosted their yields and increased
their income.
"This
new technology is what Africa needs to overcome famine and food
shortages," says Richard Sithole, chairman of the Hlabisa
District Farmers' Union. The farmers' union has some 150 emergent
farmers who plant on an average area of 2 1/2 hectares.
Sithole's
yield on his 2 1/2 ha was 100 bags compared with 80 bags the previous
season with normal hybrid seed. This was an increase of 20 bags
or 25 percent. Paulos Mwelase, chairman of the Thubalethu Farmers'
Union, planted 2 hectares of Bt corn. He was able to harvest 45
bags compared to six bags of low quality corn last year.
Sithole
said that corn used to be planted for domestic consumption, but
with the successful yield harvest they plan to focus on agriculture
as a business venture.
USAID SAYS AFRICA
NEEDS GM CROPS
Andres
Natsios, administrator of the US Agency for International Development
(USAID), says that African nations should consider using genetically
modified (GM) crops, particularly drought resistant wheat and corn,
if they are to break the cycles of famine.
Speaking
before the Committee on International Relations in the US House
of Representatives, Natsios mentioned that aside from using GM
crops, Africa needs to consider the use of small-scale irrigation
as well as the education of future African scientists who would
conduct appropriate research based on what is needed in Africa.
More
on USAID at http://www.usaid.gov
FAO LAUNCHES CROP
BIOTECH DATABASE
The
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has just released FAO-BioDeC,
a searchable database on the state-of-the-art of crop biotechnology
products and techniques which are in use, or in the pipeline, in
developing countries. The database currently includes about 2000
entries from 70 developing countries, including countries with
economies in transition.
Entries
are in English, although key database information is also provided
in Arabic, Chinese, French and Spanish. The database is still evolving
and will undergo regular updating and verification.
See http://www.fao.org/biotech/inventory_admin/dep/default.asp or
contact
fao-biodec@fao.org for
more information.
ANNOUNCEMENT:
GKC RELEASES
K SHEETS
The
Global Knowledge Center on Crop Biotechnology of the International
Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications has made
available online two K (Knowledge) Sheets summarizing the latest
results from two European Commission surveys published in the middle
of March 2003. These surveys are on "Europeans and Biotechnology
2002", and "Review of GMOs Under Research and Development
and in the Pipeline in Europe." Download both summaries from http://www.isaaa.org/kc |